Been through it on audacity. Its bullet tight. Any discrepancies are something else at fault. Looking forward too seeing what they do with future remasters.
I just heard what you mean, it's quite obvious indeed... Here's the 1989 version: cic1989.mp3 And here the new master: cic2022.mp3 It' sounds like there's too much compression on it. And here's the 2014 master which is much less compressed but has a brickwall master: cic2014.mp3 Something weird is ...
To add my two pence worth. This edition is closer to the original and lacks the added excesses of the previous edition. (48/24 digital file)
Here`s to a new approach to the older material, and that maybe a 40th anniversary edition of zoolook will not be a complete disaster like the 30th one was.
This is pretty much the holy grail. I don't understand how a kid with a camcorder could sit on a roof and record the whole concert, projections and all. When a man with a stupid haircut and a team of cameramen could only managed slow motion shots of the drummers nose.
Just be thankful that he is still going at all. At his age he is quite entitled to hang up his synths and go and find a nice golf course.
BTW, he harmonises with backing, either prerecorded or live, always has done.
I contacted scott hull at masterdisk mastering yesterday asking if the 96/24 files that he extracted from the analog masters back in 97 were still in existance. He replied and stated that these files along with the tapes were returned to sony for release etc and were maybe still in existance. As far...