Page 73 of 121

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 9:44 pm
by Jakob BC
Who said the Junos were simple? Anyway it sounds damn sweet in this demo of the Juno-6 byt Smackos (also known under hundreds of other names). Check it out:


Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:49 pm
by jp8000

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:49 am
by Abi
There is no smilie on this forum would ever begin to depict just how absolutely hilarious the following video is...

btw... it's a HORSE....




:lol:

Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:39 am
by Velodynamic
Thunderstorm in Chicago


Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:03 pm
by Jakob BC
I have always had a good spot on the Yamaha DX-7 synthesizer, and this videodemo certainly doesn't kill it 8)



This shows that it can do other than just cheesy acoustic emulations. STill it's charm also lies in the synthetic and charectiristic metallic acoustic emulations.

Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:01 am
by GeeJee
Jakob BC wrote:I have always had a good spot on the Yamaha DX-7 synthesizer, and this videodemo certainly doesn't kill it 8)



This shows that it can do other than just cheesy acoustic emulations. STill it's charm also lies in the synthetic and charectiristic metallic acoustic emulations.
Yeah, sounds great... too bad it's such a bitch to program...

Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 1:55 pm
by Jakob BC
GeeJee wrote:
Jakob BC wrote:I have always had a good spot on the Yamaha DX-7 synthesizer, and this videodemo certainly doesn't kill it 8)



This shows that it can do other than just cheesy acoustic emulations. STill it's charm also lies in the synthetic and charectiristic metallic acoustic emulations.
Yeah, sounds great... too bad it's such a bitch to program...
Yes indeed and membrane buttons only, doesn't make it better like analogues from that generation.

Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:14 pm
by GeeJee
Solution: FM7 :D

Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 4:05 pm
by Jakob BC
GeeJee wrote:Solution: FM7 :D
Ahh never thought about this one. Yes I remember something about the FM7 being DX7 patch compatible, so you can load DX-7 patches into the FM7. I guess it opens the possibility for a reversed process :wink:

Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 5:17 pm
by GeeJee
Yup, you can program sounds in the FM7 and send the sysex to DX7. But that seems a bit pointless to me, unless you care about noisy old DA convertors... ;)

Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 5:21 pm
by Nico_Noyau
The FM7 is really a nice synth, but indeed, using the FM7 to program and then the DX7 to play the sound is only useful if you want to have the exact same DX7 touch, and little noise in the outputs !
For my case, I'd have space and spare money for hooby-jooby, that's what I'd do, but for the moment, I stick to te FM7 ;) :P

Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 5:28 pm
by Jakob BC
Im a freak and a fan of those classics so ofcourse I would always stick to the hardware. Besides that, it has a vintage status, the software doesn't 8)

Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 5:38 pm
by Nico_Noyau
Yeps, you exactly get my point about VSTs :P
Even if it sounds 99% the same, it's still not 100%, and you don't have the little mistakes the DX7 had :P

Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:28 pm
by GeeJee
True - that's why I would stick to using FM7 to program it and sending the sysex to my mighty TX616 rack... which in fact is 6 times a DX7 in a rack :nod:

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 6:58 pm
by Velodynamic
Image Metrics - 99,9% artificial