Page 2 of 13
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:20 am
by jarrekid
Oh great....
Mind, to be honest, I think Dreyfus are right in a way. JMJ shouldn't have done that, you can't simply say "New Recording" when it isn't at all... I was semi-hoping for a revamped Oxygene, but it never happened. Why didn't he just release the DVD on its own????
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:29 am
by Finaero
... Why the hell did this have to happen now? Oh for fuck's sake.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:24 am
by Project_Z
BUSTED !
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:36 am
by Project_Z
BUSTED !
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:49 am
by Antigoon
Well, it all depends on what he told EMI I think, we don't know what he told them and frankly, don't believe all the marketing blah blah out there...
All dreyfus seams to want is a piece of the pie of the free giveaway CD's for the daily mail without the live recording on it... seams fair IMO if they own the copyright on it...
The tour is not really in danger because of this, with tour you gain money you see and no-one is against that
Dreyfus did a similar trick in the past though since EiC was released as hong kong to avoid dreyfus having to pay for the losses made on the europe in concert tour...
But "busted" indeed
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:58 am
by Dv_
Be carreful with what this website tells... the article contains lots of mistakes, everything about the lawsuits must be confirmed.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:07 am
by Jakob BC
Antigoon wrote:The tour is not really in danger because of this, with tour you gain money you see and no-one is against that
I have been thinking about this for a while, and it would only be economically stupid to cancel them. With this tour they can put a lot more cash in the pocket.
same article in french paper
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:45 am
by vosonik
Dv_ wrote:Be carreful with what this website tells... the article contains lots of mistakes, everything about the lawsuits must be confirmed.
http://www.lepoint.fr/slideshow/direct_ ... tml?id=810
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:48 am
by Jon
We are only reacting to what we are being told. Non of us here know the real story behind this so can only speculate.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:11 am
by Firecobra22
Well, if it's true then it's very bad bussnis for JMJ. But I have to say one thing to Dreyfus and that's f****ou
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:13 am
by Jon
Re: same article in french paper
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:26 am
by Dv_
Great, exactly what I said ! This article explains the situation with carreful words and conditional, where the other one stated things for sure.
Re: same article in french paper
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:32 am
by Firecobra22
Dv_ wrote:
Great, exactly what I said ! This article explains the situation with carreful words and conditional, where the other one stated things for sure.
So what does it say then.
Re: same article in french paper
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:34 am
by Kanta
Firecobra22 wrote:Dv_ wrote:
Great, exactly what I said ! This article explains the situation with carreful words and conditional, where the other one stated things for sure.
So what does it say then.
English translation. 
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:37 am
by Firecobra22
Bugger!! I could snap Drefus' neck right about now.
