I'm not saying that that's what I wanted. I think the public may have expected that and it was quite a shock to critics that he had changed quite a lot.GeeJee wrote:If you expect an artist to do what has been done, you ask him to not move on with his artistic ideas, which is in fact, to me, killing your artistic nature. Unless you like to do the same over and over again, which I don't. I'm sure I wouldn't like JMJ's music if it was 15 Oxygene/Equinoxe-styled albums...jarrekid wrote:It could be controversial because it was quite different from Oxy and Equinoxe. It's still a great album.
Exactly. I wasn't saying it was your point of view, but I understood it was the public opinion back at that time, which doesn't make sense to me at all. But that's easily said afterwards...jarrekid wrote:I'm not saying that that's what I wanted. I think the public may have expected that and it was quite a shock to critics that he had changed quite a lot.GeeJee wrote:If you expect an artist to do what has been done, you ask him to not move on with his artistic ideas, which is in fact, to me, killing your artistic nature. Unless you like to do the same over and over again, which I don't. I'm sure I wouldn't like JMJ's music if it was 15 Oxygene/Equinoxe-styled albums...jarrekid wrote:It could be controversial because it was quite different from Oxy and Equinoxe. It's still a great album.
I think too!!!GeeJee wrote: And I guess MF5 is a severe joke...
So taking it seriously is severely controversialBig time wrote:I think too!!!GeeJee wrote: And I guess MF5 is a severe joke...![]()
It was played live in China, so, I don't know if it is a joke. Or it would be one like Band in Rain on the organ.GeeJee wrote: And I guess MF5 is a severe joke...
It's cheesy, but I think he wanted something like that on the albumSynthesist wrote:Sorry for my no-humor on this subject, but what is funny about MF5?