BlahBlahCafe - Jean-Michel Jarre forum

radek tymecki wrote:i've recently found this

more of lost tapes?

Radek,

i think i'm gonna ask in the name of everyone : where are these from ?

Why would Jarre, in 11 minutes, copy himself poorly?

Robi wrote:

radek tymecki wrote:i've recently found this

more of lost tapes?

Radek,

i think i'm gonna ask in the name of everyone : where are these from ?

He edited his post, but he wrote earlier that it was his own work called "the lost tapes"
Sorry Radek if I spoiled anything
Still this is Oxygene style so I don't see a reason not to call it interesting.

I had a feeling it was Radek himself.

No punk is gonna fool an old git who's been listening to Jarre for almost 30 years!

I can’t listen to it, atm. Which I am grateful for as it will only make my brain go overdrive. Is it JMJ? Is it not JMJ? Is it JMJ? Is it not JMJ? And so on and on, on, on, on.

I feel dizzy.

Kanta wrote:I can’t listen to it, atm. Which I am grateful for as it will only make my brain go overdrive. Is it JMJ? Is it not JMJ? Is it JMJ? Is it not JMJ? And so on and on, on, on, on.

I feel dizzy.

There is not secret... Mods can see secret things, so have a look again Kanta

Thanxs Jakob, I get it now.

Jakob BC wrote:

Robi wrote:

radek tymecki wrote:i've recently found this

more of lost tapes?

Radek,

i think i'm gonna ask in the name of everyone : where are these from ?

He edited his post, but he wrote earlier that it was his own work called "the lost tapes"
Sorry Radek if I spoiled anything
Still this is Oxygene style so I don't see a reason not to call it interesting.

I didn't say it is not interesting, only some of us asked who made these staffs and why album cover shows JMJ's name on Hydrolux?
Anyway did Michel Geiss help something?

Robi wrote:

Jakob BC wrote:

Robi wrote: Radek,

i think i'm gonna ask in the name of everyone : where are these from ?

He edited his post, but he wrote earlier that it was his own work called "the lost tapes"
Sorry Radek if I spoiled anything
Still this is Oxygene style so I don't see a reason not to call it interesting.

I didn't say it is not interesting, only some of us asked who made these staffs and why album cover shows JMJ's name on Hydrolux?
Anyway did Michel Geiss help something?

I didn't say that you said it wasn't interesting It's reasonable to ask what it is, so did I as well

Jakob BC wrote:

Robi wrote:

Jakob BC wrote: He edited his post, but he wrote earlier that it was his own work called "the lost tapes"
Sorry Radek if I spoiled anything
Still this is Oxygene style so I don't see a reason not to call it interesting.

I didn't say it is not interesting, only some of us asked who made these staffs and why album cover shows JMJ's name on Hydrolux?
Anyway did Michel Geiss help something?

I didn't say that you said it wasn't interesting It's reasonable to ask what it is, so did I as well

Ah, got it.

I see why it was confusing. I meant that I find that "lost tapes" interesting, and not that everybody who likes Oxygene should like it. Sorry if my post was misleading anybody

I know someone already did a cover for this album - jarre or not! But here is my slightly different version.

That's pretty neat

So, technically, as these are found that would make them the found lost tapes so they are no longer lost, but found. But if they were found, they could never have been lost. Because if they hadn't have been found, they would be deemed lost and still lost.

I already used that painting for one of my Oxygene 30th Anniversary speculation cover arts last year

I preferred the other one, though.