Page 31 of 156
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:13 pm
by AnDrOiD
Synthesist wrote:
I hope you are against cars AnDrOiD, if not you are not allowed to complain about it

I'm a Kraftwerkian... I ride a bike!

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:18 pm
by Jakob BC
AnDrOiD wrote:Synthesist wrote:
I hope you are against cars AnDrOiD, if not you are not allowed to complain about it

I'm a Kraftwerkian... I ride a bike!

Thats just good, but are you against Nuclear power plants?
Now you have to choose between Kraftwerk and the cold weather.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:24 pm
by AnDrOiD
Synthesist wrote:AnDrOiD wrote:Synthesist wrote:
I hope you are against cars AnDrOiD, if not you are not allowed to complain about it

I'm a Kraftwerkian... I ride a bike!

Thats just good, but are you against Nuclear power plants?
Now you have to choose between Kraftwerk and the cold weather.
Kraftwerk ain't nuclear... they're against it as well!

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:05 pm
by littlesister
AnDrOiD wrote:
Kraftwerk ain't nuclear... they're against it as well!

...as are most rational people who have the slightest interest in the future of this planet...
( just my little rant ) 
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:09 pm
by littlesister
...by the way, the weather here is damp ( it has been raining on and off for the last few days ), and still fairly warm ( about 12-15 degrees celsius ).....
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:49 pm
by AnDrOiD
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:55 pm
by Jakob BC
AnDrOiD wrote:Synthesist wrote:AnDrOiD wrote:
I'm a Kraftwerkian... I ride a bike!

Thats just good, but are you against Nuclear power plants?
Now you have to choose between Kraftwerk and the cold weather.
Kraftwerk ain't nuclear... they're against it as well!

Yes that was my point. Nuclear plants are the best to the environment if just they don't explode. If they changed all oil power stations with Nuclear, the ozon layer wouldn't be destroyed and you could keep ypur cold weather. I hope you get what I mean.
Nuclear will solve the problem, because it doesn't make the whole in the ozon layer larger.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:59 pm
by AnDrOiD
Pest eller Kolera!?

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:00 pm
by Finaero
Synthesist wrote:Nuclear plants are the best to the environment if just they don't explode.
Amen.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:02 pm
by Dominc
It's 5 degrees where I am
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:04 pm
by Jakob BC
AnDrOiD wrote:Pest eller Kolera!?

Sounds like the best answer.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:09 pm
by AnDrOiD
Sun and wind energy, Brothers & Sisters!

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:10 pm
by Dominc
I think wind energy is good.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:13 pm
by Finaero
Guess what keeps the sun going?
That's right.
A nuclear reaction.
(Fusion, to be exact.)
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:27 pm
by littlesister
Finaero wrote:Guess what keeps the sun going?
That's right.
A nuclear reaction.
(Fusion, to be exact.)
yes, that is true, and I would have less of a problem if nuclear power was generated that way in our power stations..... the Sun uses its fuel very well, to the point that it works to use
all its fuel
with little to no waste .
The method of nuclear reaction we use in power stations is not fusion but fission...this does create waste, and therein is the problem. Using nuclear power may save the ozone layer.......but could poison the Earth with its by-products.....
Anyway, I support wind/solar power before nuclear..... just a child of the 80's I'm afraid

( sorry for going so off topic...... )
