Re: Tour 2025
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2025 7:28 am
Jean-Michel Jarre discussion forum
https://zoolook.nl/forum/

Kanta wrote: Sat Jul 05, 2025 8:00 am
Jean-Michel Jarre - Greatest hits for nerds
"Classic futurism is back," we thought after Jarre's performance on Palace Square in Brussels. Or at least something like that. What we saw was visionary but sometimes also predictable, amazing and exhausting. A mix of technological bravado and musical repetition. Jarre remains Jarre, but is that enough today?
(...)
Source: https://damusic.be/live/jean-michel-jar ... -5383.html
My thoughts exactly. Far too similar in phrasing and sentiment to be a coincidence. Perhaps Jarrepeggiator and this reviewer are the same person?!Xyxophas wrote: Sat Jul 05, 2025 11:23 amKanta wrote: Sat Jul 05, 2025 8:00 am
Jean-Michel Jarre - Greatest hits for nerds
"Classic futurism is back," we thought after Jarre's performance on Palace Square in Brussels. Or at least something like that. What we saw was visionary but sometimes also predictable, amazing and exhausting. A mix of technological bravado and musical repetition. Jarre remains Jarre, but is that enough today?
(...)
Source: https://damusic.be/live/jean-michel-jar ... -5383.html
I am convinced that the author of this review has read the forum. The exact same phrases were used by Jarrepeggiator in his review a few days ago—regarding the return of classical futurism, the expectations before the concert, Jarre's hands showing his age, his dancing during "Oxygene 4," the feeling of closeness with Jarre during the concert, and the fact that Starmus was a concert for those new to Jarre's music, while this concert is for connoisseurs. This can't be a coincidence.
Richard-Eastham wrote: Sat Jul 05, 2025 11:43 am Perhaps Jarrepeggiator and this reviewer are the same person?!![]()
Great drone footage with a nice overview shot. It looks more crowded than on the webcame footage.
Yeah, that's true. Maybe it was an AI generated review, pulling both postive and negative comments from this forum? I was disappointed about the lack of integration of the surrounding architecture, while Jarrepeggiator loved the dancing feet.Xyxophas wrote: Sat Jul 05, 2025 11:57 amRichard-Eastham wrote: Sat Jul 05, 2025 11:43 am Perhaps Jarrepeggiator and this reviewer are the same person?!![]()
Perhaps.However, in the review, some aspects of the concert are evaluated negatively, while Jarrepeggiator writes only positive comments about Jarre.
![]()
Isn't Karel just getting the photo credit here, he's not the author of the review?Dr_Jones wrote: Sat Jul 05, 2025 1:55 pm The reviewer is Karel Uyttendaele who made some fantastic photos (which I posted earlier in this topic).
Maybe it's a an AI copying things from the web...Xyxophas wrote: Sat Jul 05, 2025 11:23 amKanta wrote: Sat Jul 05, 2025 8:00 am
Jean-Michel Jarre - Greatest hits for nerds
"Classic futurism is back," we thought after Jarre's performance on Palace Square in Brussels. Or at least something like that. What we saw was visionary but sometimes also predictable, amazing and exhausting. A mix of technological bravado and musical repetition. Jarre remains Jarre, but is that enough today?
(...)
Source: https://damusic.be/live/jean-michel-jar ... -5383.html
I am convinced that the author of this review has read the forum. The exact same phrases were used by Jarrepeggiator in his review a few days ago—regarding the return of classical futurism, the expectations before the concert, Jarre's hands showing his age, his dancing during "Oxygene 4," the feeling of closeness with Jarre during the concert, and the fact that Starmus was a concert for those new to Jarre's music, while this concert is for connoisseurs. This can't be a coincidence.