Hi all,
I recently posted on my blog my thoughts on Jarre, his giveaway and the crisis in the music industry. It's quite long but I think it's a good read! What are your thoughts on the subject?
This week the 'Mail on Sunday' is giving away a copy of Jean Michel Jarre's 'Oxygene' re-recording to every reader. This has prompted me to think about Jarre's current career direction (giveaways?!) and also whether giveaways such as this are devaluing music or actually providing a way forward for a music industry which is struggling against illegal downloading?
When Mike Oldfield's 1973 classic 'Tubular Bells' was recently given away as a freebie with the 'Mail On Sunday' Oldfield complained that his record company, EMI, had allowed the promotion to take place. The 'Mail on Sunday' responded by taking out a two page ad in 'Music Week' defending their actions, stating "The whole argument is that we are devaluing music, but we are creating a stimulus." They support their statement by claiming that sales of full-price copies of 'Tubular Bells' increased 30% after the giveaway. According to 'The Guardian', music industry sources responded to the 'Mail on Sunday' claim by saying that they believed 'Tubular Bells' was a low-selling title and that a 30% hike was not that significant. Low Selling? According to Wikipedia 'Tubular Bells' has sold 'more than two million copies in the UK alone and according to some reports 15 to 17 million copies worldwide'. 'Oxygene' is much the same story for Jarre, with sales of over 15 million copies worldwide. That's not exactly low selling.
However, these classic albums have sales histories of some 30 years so a 30% hike on current 2007 sales may not be that significant. People already own or have previously owned these albums - there's not going to be a sudden mad rush to the shops some 30 years after their initial release to pick up additional copies. These albums have already done their business and with their proven history it's pretty difficult to argue that a giveaway is 'devaluing' the music in some way. The 'Mail on Sunday' says it is actually creating a stimulus, pointing to the fact that Dolly Parton's new album, 'The Very Best of Dolly Parton', entered the charts at number nine after the paper "gave away" her 'Live & Studio' album; and that the band Madness experienced a 3,000% increase in hits on its website after the paper distributed their 'Edge of the Universe' double album. The newspaper states that it is simply a different distribution channel, and that it spends "more money marketing music acts than any other music company does".
So is the Oxygene re-recording nothing more than a marketing strategy? According to the Newspaper Marketing Agency the bulk of 'Mail on Sunday' readers (14.8%) are aged between 55-64. The people in this demographic are the people who bought the original Oxygene on vinyl back in the 70's - the people who have long lost their vinyl collections and that are unlikely to have the album on CD, nor be inspired to go out and buy it a second time. The giveaway then, could be defined as an attempt to re-ignite some interest in Jarre and his music from those who may have forgotten and build up his old fan base. The figures seem to support this. Sales of Jarre's last album 'Teo & Tea' were pretty dismal, shifting only around 2700 (to existing fans probably) copies in the UK (it also dropped out of the Czech, Spanish and Italian album charts after only two weeks). The version of 'Oxygene' he is giving away in the UK only managed to get to number 127 in the UK album charts and had dropped out of the French top 50 after only five weeks. There can be little doubt that Jarre's output over the past ten years may not appeal to his original audience of the 70's. It's been more chill out and dance, and less experimental analogue synth. Although I still buy Jarre's records as they come out, my 57 year old Dad (who got me into Jarre in the first place) doesn't. The 'Mail on Sunday' giveaway of Oxygène will reach an estimated 2.7 million 'my dads'...
For the newspaper it's a win/win situation: The giveaway will help maintain momentum and the high profile of 'Oxygene' may draw additional readers. For Jarre it's more of a gamble but it doesn't seem that he really has anything to complain about: He's already released 'Oxygene 2007' around the world so he's already been making some money, He's supported the release with ten money making concerts in Paris and he has plans for further concerts throughout 2008, he will still receive a cut from the 'Mail on Sunday' (Industry sources estimate that the paper paid between £200,000 and £500,000 for the rights to Oldfield's Tubular Bells), and there the bonus of a chance that the giveaway will stimulate enough interest to turn Jarre's career around, sell a bit of back catalogue stuff, and perhaps even sell a few more albums next time - he's already suggested that his next album will have more of the 70's analogue synth.
The only thing Jarre has to do is release his next album relatively quickly to take advantage of this renewed interest before it dies down again.
With 'Teo & Tea' Jarre's career may well have been veering off in a direction not many people were interested in. The new 'Oxygene' and neext album hints suggest he's just done a massive u-turn to win back a decent fan base. What does everyone else think?