Replying to the previewing article 'Jamie Goes To Hollywood'


Post Posted Sat Sep 02, 2006 5:48 pm
GeeJee
The GUV'NOR
User avatar
Posts: 8327
Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands

Post your thoughts and replies about the previewing article 'Jamie Goes To Hollywood' here. ;)
Post Posted Sat Sep 02, 2006 7:27 pm
Nico_Noyau
Assistant Admin & Bootleg Expert
User avatar
Posts: 5682
Location: Aix en Provence, France

Great, I will have something to read tonight :D
Image Image
My music, webdev, photos, videos : www.nicolaskern.fr
Robert Dugenou

Attended :
Teo&Tea showcase in Cannes [France] - 20/05/2007
Théâtre Marigny, Paris [France] - 15/12/2007
<2010> Marseille [France] - 20/03/2010
Monaco - 01/07/2011
Arènes de Nîmes – 14/07/2016
Post Posted Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:14 pm
AnDrOiD
User avatar
Posts: 4387
Location: Planet Tellus

I can't bother to read all that. :P But my own opinion is they should have stayed clear of synths. For me, instead of sounding like great orchestral versions, it's sounds like cheap cover versions ala Starink. :(
SOUNDCLOUD
Rhythmus muss sein!

"20 years ago we had computers in the studios. Now we have studios in the computers" - Michel Moers.
Post Posted Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:57 pm
GeeJee
The GUV'NOR
User avatar
Posts: 8327
Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands

AnDrOiD wrote:I can't bother to read all that. :P But my own opinion is they should have stayed clear of synths. For me, instead of sounding like great orchestral versions, it's sounds like cheap cover versions ala Starink. :(
........ :?
Post Posted Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:07 pm
Christophe
User avatar
Posts: 1505
Location: Wommelgem, Belgium

Good review, GeeJee! Just as my opinion (I have that promo too!)... :wink:

Greetzzz...
Post Posted Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:34 pm
GeeJee
The GUV'NOR
User avatar
Posts: 8327
Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands

Preview that is...
Thanks! :D

A bit extensive now that I look at it again :lol:
Post Posted Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:33 am
AnDrOiD
User avatar
Posts: 4387
Location: Planet Tellus

GeeJee wrote:
AnDrOiD wrote:I can't bother to read all that. :P But my own opinion is they should have stayed clear of synths. For me, instead of sounding like great orchestral versions, it's sounds like cheap cover versions ala Starink. :(
........ :?
What!? :?
SOUNDCLOUD
Rhythmus muss sein!

"20 years ago we had computers in the studios. Now we have studios in the computers" - Michel Moers.
Post Posted Sun Sep 03, 2006 12:00 pm
GeeJee
The GUV'NOR
User avatar
Posts: 8327
Location: Zwolle, The Netherlands

AnDrOiD wrote:
GeeJee wrote:
AnDrOiD wrote:I can't bother to read all that. :P But my own opinion is they should have stayed clear of synths. For me, instead of sounding like great orchestral versions, it's sounds like cheap cover versions ala Starink. :(
........ :?
What!? :?
How can you be so shortsighted to not even give it a chance and base your opinion on some short snippets...?
These musicians are very skilled and are in no way comparable to cheap cover-artists, I respect them very much.
Up to you of course, but I think you should check it out properly... :?
Post Posted Sun Sep 03, 2006 1:05 pm
Jarp2600
User avatar
Posts: 3136
Location: Apeldoorn, NL

I also don't understand your comparison with Starink. What I've heard from the album is very good. Some tracks sounds better than the original!
Post Posted Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:17 pm
AnDrOiD
User avatar
Posts: 4387
Location: Planet Tellus

GeeJee wrote:
AnDrOiD wrote:
GeeJee wrote: ........ :?
What!? :?
How can you be so shortsighted to not even give it a chance and base your opinion on some short snippets...?
These musicians are very skilled and are in no way comparable to cheap cover-artists, I respect them very much.
Up to you of course, but I think you should check it out properly... :?
Sure, where are the album available for download. If I like it, I'll buy it. :P

Well, when listening to the snippet of Magnetic Fields 1, Starink comes to mind.
SOUNDCLOUD
Rhythmus muss sein!

"20 years ago we had computers in the studios. Now we have studios in the computers" - Michel Moers.
Post Posted Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:20 pm
AnDrOiD
User avatar
Posts: 4387
Location: Planet Tellus

Jarp2600 wrote:Some tracks sounds better than the original!
Blasphemy! :evil: Surely you can't have been a fan of Jarre for many years.
SOUNDCLOUD
Rhythmus muss sein!

"20 years ago we had computers in the studios. Now we have studios in the computers" - Michel Moers.
Post Posted Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:24 pm
Finaero
User avatar
Posts: 3193
Location: Finland
Likes given: 231
Likes received  : 74

AnDrOiD wrote:
Jarp2600 wrote:Some tracks sounds better than the original!
Blasphemy! :evil: Surely you can't have been a fan of Jarre for many years.
Wow. Opinions.
Post Posted Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:26 pm
Jarp2600
User avatar
Posts: 3136
Location: Apeldoorn, NL

Indeed, for three years. Before I didn't know him! :lol: But I'm a die-hard Jarre-fan! Some tracks are just better when played with an orchestra!
Post Posted Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:23 pm
Ronja
English Moderator
User avatar
Posts: 980
Location: Poland :)

It must took looots of work :D


I liked it, they said few interesting things and I found answers for some aspects I was wondering about. Congrats then! ;)
> BlahBlahCafe TEAM :D

www.jeanmicheljarre.pl team
Post Posted Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:27 pm
Velodynamic
User avatar
Posts: 3472
Location: Sweden, far north
Likes given: 1
Likes received  : 2

Jarp2600 wrote:Indeed, for three years. Before I didn't know him! :lol: But I'm a die-hard Jarre-fan! Some tracks are just better when played with an orchestra!
For Gloria, Lonely Boy I might agree with you. :lol: But the most of it sounds very good in a different way than the originals. Imo an orchestra creates an awesome powerfull, pompous, grandiose feeling to almost any type of music...specially Jarre's music. Still of course they didn't catch exactly the same atmosphere, same kind of interesting sounds that really screams at you to activate your brain, to really "explore" the music that makes you fly beyond the milky way. You just lie back and let this ocean of acoustic notes and tones wash over you and hit you right in the stomach. Hard to explaine but simply 2 different dimensions of the same melodies. :)

@Android: I must agree that MF 1 doesn't seem to be the best track of this album, but I think it's entertaining to hear how they really gives it a serious try to play a (somewhat) acoustic version (I don't wright "cover" because Jarre and Samard obviously had a small part in this project) and there are lots of other tracks on TSJMJ that seems to be a fantastic show of very scilled, highly professional classic musicians giving us a whole new view of Jean Michel Jarre's music. It's an understatement to rule out a project of this scale only because of a few tracks less good...I look at it as a "nice try" and really enjoy the rest of them. :P

Conserning the article it's well written :mrgreen: and it's interesting to see that this is not a joke. *respect* 8)
Last edited by Velodynamic on Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.







  • 2020 Zoolook.nl
    Powered by phpBB forum software