Welcome to the new BlahBlahCafe!

Having trouble registering? You can contact us at the "Contact us" link at the bottom of the page.

The boards have been moved to a new server. If you have trouble signing in, or other problems on the boards, feel free to contact us.

Equinoxe


Post Posted Sun Dec 01, 2024 6:09 pm
Jarrepeggiator
Banned

Posts: 172
Likes given: 47
Likes received  : 59

Jarrepeggiator wrote: Sun Dec 01, 2024 6:08 pm Happy 46th anniversary to Jean-Michel Jarre’s fourth studio album, Equinoxe!

Nowadays this album is regarded as a true classic in every way, but its legacy in the fanbase still seems a bit unfair to the album, because many fans just think of this album as „an other Oxygene”. And yes, in terms of instrumentation, it’s definitely close to Jarre’s most famous work, but we should also remember how different it is in many ways. In my personal opinion, Equinoxe is actually even better than Oxygene.

First of all, on Equinoxe, Jarre wanted to create a totally different take on electronic music. If we really take a closer look, Equinoxe was the first album of ’modern French Electronica’. Unlike the some of the more repetitive sequences on Oxygene, the concept of Equinoxe was to make an album from constantly evolving sounds. Jarre wanted everything to keep changing, evolving, creating a totally different take on electronic music compared to the repetitive, rigid German version, Equinoxe has more emotional and melodic substance, but at the same time, Equinoxe also has a more dynamic, more intensly rhythmic approach compared to – for example – Italian or Greek electronic music of end of the 70s. Oxygene was already a step towards this direction, but Jarre mastered it on Equinoxe.
Therefore, unlike on Oxygene, the sequencing on Equinoxe was done almost totally by hands to keep it evolving. Jarre even said that for this album, he used waves as an example. He said that in the water, you see waves being formed again and again, but they are never exactly the same. Watching the water is boring if someone just plays the same wave again and again, but the actual waves are never boring, because they are constantly evolving, changing.

So Equinoxe was a new, specifically French way of making electronic music. This is why it took Jarre 8 months to produce Equinoxe, while it only took him 1,5 months to create Oxygene. One one hand, Equinoxe is more richer on a melodic level, on the other hand, the pacing is more intense when you compare it to Oxygene. This approach is still part of French electronica, just listen to artists like French 79, M83 or Rone.

But the most amazing thing about Equinoxe and the real reason why I think it’s a perfect album is the fantastic album structure. On Oxygene, you have the more melodic & rhythmic tracks and the more atmospheric tracks, that back and forth between the „sunnier” and „darker” tracks – as Jarre calls them – could go on forever. But Equinoxe was specifically created to work as one big unity of music. It has a beginning, it starts slowly, it gets more intense, it gives you variations and finally, it reaches the highest, most cathertic point, before finally coming back to Earth and giving closure. Equinoxe isn’t just a collection of tracks, but it’s basically one, 37 minute long song.

The struture of Equinoxe is exactly how one good single track should be like structured: A short intro (E1), slow build-up (E2-3), a tune (E4), variations (E5), more build-up (E6) and finally, the best, most intense, most cathartic, most dynamic high point, Equinoxe 7. Everything on the albums feel like it prepares you for E7, the longest, most complex track, right before the final song. Even the song itself has an inner high point, that final key change. And after that, it gives you a ’goodbye’, a closing track (E8). Just like how a single track could do. Many 6 or 8 minte electronic tracks have similar structure to this album. This is just utterly brilliant, in my opinion. No other Jarre album has a structure like this.

Equinoxe is the ultimate analogue space music album. It’s perfectly understandable that after Equinoxe, Jarre gave up on analog space music making forever. Jean-Michel Jarre never wants to do something that he thinks was perfected already. If he is done with a certain style, he moves on. After Oxygene, he clearly felt that he still has some work to do with this space music style. After Equinoxe, he was done, he finished and moved on from his „classic style”. He probably felt that what he created is everthing he could do with these instruments, in this style and it’s time do something else. Then, he got his Fairlight CMI and the rest is history.

Image
I've sent this post to a JMJ Facebook group. Michel Geiss is a member of the group and he liked my post.

He also added: "I had designed a method of synchronisation that used a track on the tape recorder to record several sequences synchronised with each other, and always locked to my drum machine. My sequencer drove an ARP 2600. An input for the ARP keyboard allowed the sequences to be transposed in real time, which not only allowed the sequences to be transposed, but also the pitch of the notes to be modulated while the sequencer was running.In this way we were able to produce the music in a very unusual way."
Post Posted Tue Feb 25, 2025 9:43 pm
melo


User avatar
Posts: 787
Location: Brazil
Likes given: 2
Likes received  : 34

Here are Lacuna Coil singer Cristina Scabbia's five favorite albums when she was a teenager.

From 1985 through 1991, her teenage years aligned with some of the most exciting musical developments of the era. While, in her adult years, Scabbia would go on to become a gothic metal icon, the sounds and styles that dominated her formative years were actually quite from removed from heavy music.


Jean Michel Jarre, 'Equinoxe' (1978)

An instrumental album that’s so evocative and a total trippy journey. I spent hours laying on the floor in my room as a teenager listening to it.

I still listen to it at times and I still love to create mental images over it.



Read More: Cristina Scabbia's 5 Favorite Albums When She Was a Teenager | https://loudwire.com/lacuna-coil-cristi ... m=referral
Ricardo Melo
Jarrefan-Brazil
www.jarrefan.com.br

Attented concert:
Port Hercule, Monaco - 2011
Post Posted Fri Mar 28, 2025 8:41 pm
phonetic1990


User avatar
Posts: 21
Location: Poland
Likes given: 4
Likes received  : 10

Which version of CD Equinoxe you prefer?

800 025-2 01 (mastered like vinyl pressings, 1st press with original version Equinoxe 5, also Equinoxe 8 ending is a bit longer, a hissing sound that you can clearly hear mostly at the beginning of Equinoxe 1 and 5 and at the end of Equinoxe 4 and 8.

https://www.discogs.com/release/3105625 ... e-Equinoxe
https://www.discogs.com/release/9144340 ... e-Equinoxe

or 800 025-2 02, 800 025-2 03 (mastered like someone had taken a blanket off the speakers while listening to the album, making the sound seem clearer, 2nd press with remixed version Equinoxe 5 published to this day on CDs Equinoxe or compilations albums, Equinoxe 8 ending is a little shorter, little less hissing sound.

https://www.discogs.com/release/3783070 ... e-Equinoxe
https://www.discogs.com/release/3676283 ... e-Equinoxe
"The most amazing sight... ever viewed... by the human eye!" :shock:
Fan JMJ at first 1997... later in 2005 and really from 2009 to ∞ :)
Post Posted Fri Mar 28, 2025 8:50 pm
Finaero


User avatar
Posts: 3193
Location: Finland
Likes given: 202
Likes received  : 64

In the "blind test" of Equinoxe 5 back in the day on these forums, I did choose the red-faced 800 025-2 01 as sounding the best, but that was only based on that track (and I was surprised that I had chosen the "muddier" version over the other ones).

Currently not having any past CD editions of Equinoxe of my own, I guess the 800 025-2 01 still wins ;)

(Over all my favorite version is definitely https://www.discogs.com/release/2334338 ... e-Equinoxe with the remixed version of Equinoxe 5 - the Japanese LP had the "muddy" Equinoxe 5, the MFSL CD/LP were good too, the 1997 remastered CD was fine before I got the LPs but the 1991 digital remaster sounded quite "anemic" if I remember correctly)
Post Posted Fri Aug 22, 2025 12:45 am
Herr Dunkel


Posts: 186
Location: Philly, yo!
Likes given: 52
Likes received  : 19

An ad for Équinoxe in Billboard of 16 DEC 1978:

https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archi ... -12-16.pdf

Page 9
Concerts: 2017: Upper Darby < 2010: Lille, Liège, Paris < 1997: Lille < 1990: La Défense
Post Posted Wed Aug 27, 2025 5:09 pm
Finaero


User avatar
Posts: 3193
Location: Finland
Likes given: 202
Likes received  : 64

I recently bought a copy of the contest-winner 800 025-2 Matrix 01 CD, and while now I can certainly hear the differences between the mixes of Equinoxe 5 a lot better than before (f.ex. the sequences added to/remixed in the second edition LP & CD versions, as you can hear in the samples attached), I'm still amazed by how the CD version of the first mix of the track still sounds so much better than the LP versions of the mix (IMO) - the vinyl ones still sound to me like they were recorded inside a bag or something ;)

(The samples are a comparison between the CD and this edition of the LP which is my favorite - and contains the remixed version of Equinoxe 5)
Attachments
5LP.mp3
(248.31 KiB) Downloaded 278 times
5CD.mp3
(208.79 KiB) Downloaded 246 times
4LP.mp3
(305.18 KiB) Downloaded 264 times
4CD.mp3
(285.59 KiB) Downloaded 273 times
Post Posted Wed Aug 27, 2025 8:55 pm
Dr_Jones


User avatar
Posts: 4848
Location: Leiden, Netherlands
Likes given: 414
Likes received  : 590

Doesn't the 1979 LP have the "new" version of Equinoxe 5, just like the post 800 025-2 01 CDs have? (that's what I always thought)
Post Posted Thu Aug 28, 2025 5:37 am
Finaero


User avatar
Posts: 3193
Location: Finland
Likes given: 202
Likes received  : 64

Oh yeah, I can't remember all the samples from the thread 10 years ago, but since I've been more or less listening to that 1979 LP version of the album ever since, I had forgotten how different the mixing between the two versions actually was - the reissued LP audio sort of sounds like someone really upped the treble (in addition to including the newer mix of part 5).

That said, when I got the Japanese LP edition a few years back (sold it recently), which uses the 1st mix of Equinoxe 5 (or likely, the whole album in general), indeed the track again sounded too muffled to me so I didn't listen to it that much.
Post Posted Thu Aug 28, 2025 8:07 am
Jote


User avatar
Posts: 1420
Location: Lodz, Poland
Likes given: 79
Likes received  : 200

BTW not sure if mentioned that, but sometime ago I noticed how the new mix of Equinoxe 5 is just "pasted" into the original LP/800025-2 01 recording. I'd always thought that they replaced re-recorded some parts and maybe EQed the others, but no, it's a completely different recording grafted on the original recording of the B-side. You can hear by listening closely to the transition between Equinoxe 5 and 6 - at one point the sequence starts to sound a bit weird, somewhat "doubled" and slightly metallic - that's because the new Equinoxe 5 and the old Equinoxe 6 are not perfectly aligned (on my rip of 800025-2 02 where Equinoxe 5 is 3:55 you can hear during the final 5 seconds or so). The 800025-2 01 doesn't exhibit this effect.
Post Posted Thu Aug 28, 2025 1:56 pm
Finaero


User avatar
Posts: 3193
Location: Finland
Likes given: 202
Likes received  : 64

Oh yeah, I can hear the doubled-sound effect in the newer version.

Somewhat similarly (this might have been brought up before as well), the CD (therefore all editions of the album using the first overall mix, I guess) doesn't have the "foreshadowing echoes" of the high strings of Equinoxe 1 (or they're hidden deeper into the mix) whereas they're quite clear when boosting the volume in the reissued version. I think I already heard that in the MFSL LP years ago (can't remember how it was on the CD version) and thought there was something wrong with my at-the-time (quite cheapo) turntable instead :P
Attachments
1LP.mp3
(122.04 KiB) Downloaded 267 times
1CD.mp3
(110.67 KiB) Downloaded 253 times
Post Posted Tue Sep 02, 2025 5:14 pm
shadow


User avatar
Posts: 1740
Likes received  : 80

I only have the Red Face CD and the Japanese LP of the album, can't quite compare with the reworked LP, but would love to hear what you're talking about with the transition! :O
27-11-10: Ahoy Rotterdam
22-11-16: Heineken Music Hall Amsterdam
01-07-25: Palais royal de Bruxelles/Paleizen Plein Brussel
Post Posted Wed Sep 03, 2025 3:52 pm
Finaero


User avatar
Posts: 3193
Location: Finland
Likes given: 202
Likes received  : 64

This is the best comparison I could make (Redface vs. Dadwater), the doubling is actually more apparent thanks to Perreau ;)
Attachments
6SPOT.mp3
(121.04 KiB) Downloaded 260 times
6CD.mp3
(138.26 KiB) Downloaded 258 times
Post Posted Wed Sep 03, 2025 9:41 pm
Jote


User avatar
Posts: 1420
Location: Lodz, Poland
Likes given: 79
Likes received  : 200

Finaero wrote: Wed Sep 03, 2025 3:52 pm This is the best comparison I could make (Redface vs. Dadwater), the doubling is actually more apparent thanks to Perreau ;)
I think those snippets are too short to notice - like you need to listen to a couple of more seconds before to hear the doubling effect kicking it. When taken out of context it might be hard to hear.
Post Posted Thu Sep 04, 2025 1:28 pm
Finaero


User avatar
Posts: 3193
Location: Finland
Likes given: 202
Likes received  : 64

Yeah, I can't really fully pin-point it, but that part sounds the most doubled to me

I guess the extended doubled part, in this (reissued) vinyl rip video, lasts from around 23:10 to 23:23 or so:

Post Posted Thu Sep 04, 2025 1:45 pm
Jote


User avatar
Posts: 1420
Location: Lodz, Poland
Likes given: 79
Likes received  : 200

Finaero wrote: Thu Sep 04, 2025 1:28 pm Yeah, I can't really fully pin-point it, but that part sounds the most doubled to me

I guess the extended doubled part, in this (reissued) vinyl rip video, lasts from around 23:10 to 23:23 or so:

That's a good reference. The doubling effect is the strongest around 23:16.







  • 2020 Zoolook.nl
    Powered by phpBB forum software